‍The Hidden Tax on Insurance: Why Payments Are Broken

Leave a Comment
/
Industry insights
/
By
Nicolette Mtisi

The Hidden Tax on Insurance: Why Payments Are Broken

The Money Is Moving. Just Not Fast Enough.

The U.S. insurance industry collects over $1.7 trillion in premiums every year. It pays out hundreds of billions more in claims, commissions, and vendor settlements. By any measure, it is one of the largest money-moving machines on the planet.

And yet, at the center of that machine, a check is still being printed and mailed.

That is not a metaphor. According to the 2025 AFP Payments Fraud and Control Survey, checks are the payment method most subject to fraud, with 63% of organizations experiencing attempted or actual check fraud in 2024. Nacha notes that many businesses are being misled into thinking checks are safer than digital alternatives — the data says the opposite. Meanwhile, insurers managing billions in outflows are still reconciling transactions manually, fielding calls from claimants asking where their money is, and losing customers to competitors who figured out how to pay people faster.

Payment friction in insurance is not just an inconvenience. It is a structural problem with real financial consequences, and the industry is only beginning to reckon with it.

What 'Friction' Actually Costs

When industry professionals talk about payment friction, they typically mean anything that slows, complicates, or introduces error into the movement of money. In insurance, that friction shows up in three main places: premium collection, claims disbursement, and agent commissions.

On the claims side, the numbers are striking. The average property claim took 32.4 days to process in 2025, up from 23.9 days the year before, largely driven by catastrophe volume. Disaster-related claims stretched to 34.2 days on average. And that is just the processing window. The actual payment timeline adds more time on top: ACH transfers take 2 to 5 business days, and mailed checks can take longer, with errors causing bounce-backs and additional delays.

According to Deloitte's analysis of claims transformation, digitally processed homeowner claims reduced time to payment by up to 5.5 days compared to traditional paper-based filing. And the cost of issuing a single commercial check averages $7.78 and can climb past $20 when processing, mailing, and reconciliation are factored in. Multiply that across thousands of claims and the operational drag becomes significant.

On the premium side, the friction is different but equally costly. Credit card acceptance carries high fees and chargeback exposure, while ACH debits face return risks. SnapRefund's 2024 Agency Market Research found that a significant share of agencies report invoices paid late, payment terms stretching beyond 30 days, and cash flow that is difficult to predict — all symptoms of a billing system that has not kept up with how money moves today.

$7.78 to $20+  Average cost to issue one commercial check

32.4 days  Average property claim cycle time in 2025

63%  (AFP, 2025)  Organizations experiencing check fraud attacks in 2024

up to 5.5 days  (Deloitte)  Reduction in payment time with digital claims filing

The Consumer Has Already Moved On

According to McKinsey's 2024 Digital Payments Survey, roughly 92% of U.S. consumers made some form of digital payment over the past year, a new high. The Federal Reserve's Consumer Payments Study reinforces this shift: more than three quarters of consumers chose faster payment options as a preferred method, and younger generations increasingly rely on digital wallets for day-to-day transactions.

Insurance has not kept pace. According to Deloitte, the percentage of claims handled virtually skyrocketed during the pandemic but adoption remains uneven across the industry. When policyholders file a claim after a disaster and then wait more than a month to receive funds, the experience does not just frustrate them. It signals that their insurer does not understand what it means to be financially vulnerable. That signal drives churn.

The Problem Is Structural, Not Incidental

It would be easy to frame this as a technology gap, something that a better app or a faster API could fix. But the roots of payment friction in insurance go deeper than software. They are embedded in how the industry was built.

Insurance carriers rely on core systems designed decades ago, before real-time payments existed as a concept. Deloitte's 2026 Insurance Outlook notes that insurers face mounting pressure from legacy infrastructure that slows both underwriting and payment operations, creating compounding competitive risk as customer expectations rise and new entrants enter the market.

Regulatory complexity adds another layer. Insurance is state-regulated, which means payment processes that work in one market may not comply in another. Building for compliance often means building conservatively, and conservative builds tend to favor the familiar over the fast.

Why This Matters Now

The urgency around payment modernization is not coming from internal pressure alone. InsurTech competitors have entered the space with the explicit promise of faster, simpler money movement. And as McKinsey's research shows digital wallet adoption accelerating across every age group and channel, the gap between what insurance offers and what consumers expect continues to widen.

Carriers that address this gap early are finding real competitive advantages. McKinsey analysis shows claims analytics alone can reduce processing times by up to 40%, while digital claims submission reduces cycle times by approximately 46% compared to traditional methods. The ROI is clear. So is the risk of waiting.

Part 2 of this series will examine what the insurance industry is doing right now to modernize money movement, from digital wallets and instant claims to real-time premium collection and the platforms making it possible.

 

← Previous Post
No more post

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.